The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance.

1. On August 9, 2017, the fact that the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for construction works, such as temporary removal, toilets, lightweight steel bars, and waterproof of rooftop houses (hereinafter “instant removal works”) of the land-based commercial building with the wife population C (hereinafter “instant building”) on the basis of the fact that the Plaintiff entered into the contract with the Defendant for KRW 62,00,000,000, does not conflict between the parties.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. 1) The Plaintiff asserts as follows, and sought payment of KRW 20 million to the Defendant. In other words, on August 9, 2017, the Plaintiff concluded a contract with the Defendant for the entire cost of KRW 144,240,00 for the removal of the instant building, including the removal of the instant building, but did not receive KRW 20,00,00 out of the construction cost. Even if the Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have received a contract for the entire construction cost of KRW 14,240,00 as below, the Plaintiff actually received KRW 1240,240,000 from the Defendant, KRW 60,00 for the above construction cost of KRW 20,00 for KRW 40,00 for KRW 60 for the total construction cost of KRW 60,00 for KRW 30,00 for the above construction cost of KRW 60,00 for KRW 20 for the removal of the instant building cost of KRW 60,300,000 for the construction work cost of KRW 20.