1. The Defendant’s KRW 27.6 million to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s 5% per annum from December 7, 2017 to June 26, 2018.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who operates the main points with the trade name of “C” (hereinafter “instant main points”), and the Defendant is a person who visited and became aware of the Plaintiff as a customer of the said main points.

B. On October 24, 2017, the Defendant was indicted by this Court by intimidation, destruction of and damage to literature, defamation, and obstruction of work against the Plaintiff. On October 24, 2017, the above court rendered a conviction of the Defendant of imprisonment for August, suspension of execution for two years, probation, and community service order for 240 hours, and the summary of the crime is as follows.

("Defendant" means the Defendant, and the "victim" means the Plaintiff). Summary of the facts constituting a crime

1. Intimidation the Defendant sent letters to the Defendant on May 2016, 2016, stating that “I will, if not, come to the Defendant’s seat, I will wait for ten minutes.” The Defendant sent back the victim’s name to the victim, and divide the victim’s name into several times and the first race into several times and intimidation.

2. Damage to property;

A. On December 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (a) thrown a mobile phone with a market price of one million won or more of the victims and damaged the cell phone.

B. On February 2016, the Defendant: (a) laid the victim’s mobile phone amounting to KRW 800,000,000 at the end of the horse and damaged it.

C. On April 28, 2016, the Defendant: (a) laid a cell phone of a victim with a market price of at least KRW 800,000,000; and (b) destroyed

D. On July 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) with a white role, fallen on the right side of the main entrance of the instant case, and then destroying the entrance owned by the victim due to market price.

E. On July 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) fallen on the right side of the main entrance of the instant case with a white role, thereby destroying the entrance owned by the victim due to market price, thereby destroying the entrance.

E. On July 5, 2016, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the property owned by the victim due to the market price by falling away from each of the doors and coordinates on the right side of the main station of this case, and the right side windows, respectively; and (b) destroyed the above property owned by the victim due to the lack of the “towing well” in the toilet screen.

F. On July 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) fallen at the victim’s residence entrance door, and opened the entrance door owned by the victim due to the city price.