The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable because the sentence (500,000 won in penalty, 500,000 won in penalty) declared by the court below against the defendant is too unfasible.

2. The instant crime is an unfavorable circumstance against the Defendant, inasmuch as the Defendant, without any justifiable reason, damages a poster on the wall of a house by hanging on a wall, and the nature of the crime is bad, and the crime that damages propaganda facilities under the Public Official Election Act, such as poster, etc., may impair the elector’s right to know, the fairness of election, and the usefulness of election management.

Meanwhile, the circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects his mistake, the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case by contingency under the influence of alcohol, and the political intent or purpose to influence the election is deemed not to have existed, and the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the same crime or fine.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 벌금 5만 원 ~ 400만 원 ◈ 이 사건 공직 선거법 위반죄에 대하여는 양형기준이 설정되어 있지 아니함 , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조) 등을 종합해 보면, 원심이 피고인에게 선고한 형이 너무 가벼워서 부당 하다고 할 수 없다.

Therefore, the prosecutor's improper argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.