The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable as the punishment (the fine of 500,000 won and the suspended sentence) declared by the court below against the Defendants is too uneased.

2. The instant crime committed by the Defendants, without any reason, damages the poster attached to the entrance wall of an apartment without the entrance of the apartment, and the crime of damaging propaganda facilities under the Public Official Election Act, such as posters, etc. is disadvantageous to the Defendants, such as the following: (a) the Defendants’ right to know the elector; (b) the fairness of the election; and (c) the usefulness of election management; and (d) the Defendants are likely to be detrimental

On the other hand, the Defendants recognized the crime of this case to reflect their mistakes, the Defendants appear to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent manner under the influence of alcohol, and the political intent or purpose of having no effect on the election seems to have been achieved. The Defendants are primary offenders who have no record of criminal punishment, which are favorable to the Defendants.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인들의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 벌금 5만 원 ~ 400만 원 ◈ 이 사건 공직 선거법 위반죄에 대하여는 양형기준이 설정되어 있지 아니함 , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조) 등을 종합해 보면, 원심이 피고인들에게 선고한 형이 너무 가벼워서 부당 하다고 할 수 없다.

Therefore, the prosecutor's improper argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.