1. The part of the judgment of the first instance against the defendant National Credit Union Federation shall be revoked.

2. Defendant.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part of the basic facts is that the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment, except for the following modifications. Thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second two pages of the judgment of the first instance shall be referred to as " January 20, 2016" as " January 22, 2016."

6 pages 6 of the first instance judgment are as follows: (a) 6 pages 1 through 4; (b) 1, 2, 5, 9 through 12; and (c) 1 of the evidence of No. 1 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination on the main defense of the Defendant Federation

A. The gist of the main defense of safety is that the Plaintiff is entitled to remedy the right by obtaining confirmation of the invalidity of the instant disciplinary action against the Defendant B, and there is no benefit to separately confirm that the instant disciplinary action, which is the premise thereof, is null and void. The Plaintiff’s claim against the Plaintiff’s Federation is unlawful, since only the Defendant B, who notified the Plaintiff of the instant disciplinary action, has the qualification as

B. In full view of the following circumstances, the instant request for disciplinary action, prior to the determination of the facts and the entire purport of arguments, can be seen as having a specific and direct impact on the Plaintiff’s legal status, and thus, there is a benefit to seek confirmation of its invalidity. The Defendant Federation’s qualification as the Defendant is a party to the request for disciplinary action, and therefore, the said defense by the Defendant Federation is without merit.

(1) Pursuant to Articles 84 and 89 of the Credit Unions Act, the president of the National Credit Union Federation of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the "National Credit Union Federation Chairperson") may request a credit union (hereinafter referred to as the "Union") to take disciplinary action against its employees according to the results of inspection of its business affairs, and in such cases, the union shall lower the amount of disciplinary action as above in accordance with Article 48 (4) of the Enforcement Rule of the