Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000,000,000,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B is the vice president of corporation D for the purpose of the game machine manufacturing business, vending machine manufacturing business, etc., and Defendant A is the person who operates the F'F' in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E and 1st floor game room.

No person shall provide information on the distribution or use of a game product which has not been classified for the purpose of distribution or use, or display or store it for such purpose.

From October 29, 2016 to November 3, 2011, the Defendant provided eight straw games (bening players) not classified by “F” in Seoul, Gwangjin-gu and 1st floor to customers, and provided eight straw games (bening players) not classified by “F”. The Defendant provided eight straw games (bening players) for the use of the ungraded games.

On October 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 2017, the Defendant: (b) around 2016: (c) around 16 million won, sold the game products to the Defendant and distributed the game products that were not rated to the Defendant, who was not rated within the area of personal extraction operated by Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E and A with the first floor; and (d) around 16 million won.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Scenic photographs;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, correspondences and response reports on control support;

1. Relevant Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 1 of the Game Industry Promotion Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment on criminal facts: Selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act / [The Defendants and the defense counsel did not receive rating for the cream (hereinafter “the instant game machine”) as indicated in the facts constituting a crime, but the instant game machine does not constitute a game product subject to rating because it has its own function. However, the court asserted that the instant game machine does not constitute a game product subject to rating. However, the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court were added to the function of the self-market in the instant game machine.

Do.