beta
Text
1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.
The Defendant’s KRW 616,959 for the Plaintiff and its related costs on November 21, 2017.
Reasons
1. On November 14, 2017, around 16:56, a claim for reimbursement related to a traffic accident that occurred on the three-lane road near the D Hospital located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si (see, e.g., attached Form C). 2. The instant accident is an accident that conflict with the Defendant vehicle (other than a vehicle on which a broom is marked in the attached Form Nos. 2) that the Plaintiff (a vehicle on the site of an accident) stops at the two-lanes of the three-lane road and returned to the left at the right frame in the end of the permissible section of the adjacent one-lane road and tried to turn to the left at the right frame of the Plaintiff vehicle.
(A) According to the evidence Nos. 4 and B No. 1, the accident of this case is deemed to have been caused by the principal negligence of the Defendant vehicle, which, after passing through the front side of the Plaintiff vehicle without entering the front side of the right side, tried to make a left turn immediately and immediately enter the front part of the Plaintiff vehicle, in a safe way to the rear side of the Plaintiff vehicle at one lane where the U-turn is allowed.
However, in light of the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle started to turn to the left with the U-turn signal at the section where U-turns are permitted, and the Plaintiff’s vehicle continues to stop for one year after the vehicle stops in the front, without any particular reason, even though all preceding vehicles were stopped after the vehicle stops in the front, and the Defendant’s vehicle entering the front section of the U-Ston’s permissible section could have sufficiently discovered that the left-hand turn to the left-hand turn was in the front side, it is reasonable to view the negligence ratio of the Plaintiff’s vehicle and the Defendant’s vehicle as 30:70.
3. Amount recognized as indemnity amount: 616,959 won: Insurance money paid by the plaintiff 881,370 won (Evidence 1) ¡¿ 70%.
4. The defendant's appeal has some grounds.