logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.01.15 2019가단5068998
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The relevant Plaintiff is an insurer who has entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the automobile C (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant is a mutual aid business entity who has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to Dsi (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. (1) On September 22, 2018, the Plaintiff driver of the instant vehicle: (a) around 19:20 on September 22, 2018, the driver of the instant vehicle made a left-hand turn to the four-lane road from the bank wood distance to the new transmission distance; and (b) from the same perspective, the Defendant driver of the instant vehicle started a U.S. vehicle with the U.S. driver’s vehicle moving to the U.S. U.S. (e., the U.S.) the U.S. vehicle at the right-hand and walking signal at the left-hand and walking signal at the right-hand turn, and the two-lanes of the four-lane road at the right-hand and the two-lanes of the two-lane road at the right-hand distance from the bank wood distance to the new transmission distance at the front of the two-lane.

Plaintiff

The FSC set the point of accident into three lanes (A No. 6, No. 1-4, No. 5, and No. 6), but in this context, the two-lanes are indicated in accordance with the police's report on the actual traffic accident. The driver of the Defendant vehicle, who was in a direct position, continued to drive the Plaintiff vehicle on the front-round red signal that the U.S. driver is not allowed for U.S., and the driver of the Defendant vehicle, who was found or found the Plaintiff vehicle that was approaching the front-round, was not discovered due to the neglect of the front-round, or that the Plaintiff vehicle would be driven by the Defendant vehicle.

Due to such negligence, the Defendant’s vehicle was proceeding at a rapid speed in the future of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and eventually, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was faced with the front part of the left-hand part of the vehicle (hereinafter “instant accident”).

3. The defendant vehicle immediately before the accident of this case exceeds the white point of the U.S. section, and the direction of the vehicle of the plaintiff vehicle.

arrow