1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the matters cited in paragraph (2) by filing a complaint or adding, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of

2. Part 8 of the decision of the first instance court in which the entry or addition is made shall be changed to "where the buyer makes a request" to "where the seller makes a request."

After the fifth fifth decision of the court of first instance, "G filed a lawsuit claiming the revocation of the second building permit with the head of Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City as the other party to the Seoul Administrative Court. However, on March 24, 2017, "Building permit revocation was a binding act, and G did not commence construction work after the lapse of one year from the date it received the second building permit, as well as after June 30, 2015, which was the deadline for the commencement of extended construction, the second building permit shall be revoked in accordance with Article 11 (7) 1 of the former Building Act (amended by Act No. 14535, Jan. 17, 2017). Even if the second building permit revocation constitutes discretionary act, the second building permit revocation was finalized on the ground that it cannot be deemed that there was an abuse of discretion, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on the ground that "No. 16, 1600, 199" and "No. 9, 16, 1960."

On February 15, 2008, the plaintiff submitted to the head of Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Public Health Center a report on the increase of basic property of a medical corporation, and the above report was accepted. The above report stated the purpose of acquiring the land of this case as "the purpose of acquiring the land of this case is to expand medical facilities (construction of buildings) and to improve incidental facilities such as roads for the development of hospital and the convenience of patients," and the plaintiff stated that the purpose of acquiring the land of this case is "the purpose of acquiring the land of this case is to expand the medical facilities (construction of buildings) and to improve the incidental facilities such as roads."