logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.27 2017나2027981
보험금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

However, the plaintiff's assertion that has been repeatedly emphasized in the trial shall be partially dismissed or added as in paragraph (2) by reflecting the contents of the judgment, etc.

2. Parts to be dried or added;

A. On the 4th 17th 18th 18th 18th 1st 4th 18th 18th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 2th 1st 2th 2th 2th 2th 5th 5th 5th 2th 6th 6th 6th 6th 10th 1st 2th 2th 3th 2th 2th 20

(b) 6 pages 14 through 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be stated as follows:

⑤ D Hospital Doctor E diagnosed the Plaintiff on April 3, 2017 regarding the fact-finding by the court of first instance: “B hospital’s progress record on October 27, 2014, does not state any opinion of degradation of the result of the evaluation of the Plaintiff’s diversology before the Plaintiff’s operation, and there is no record of the mathic total damage caused by the everative frame No. 2000, Oct. 28, 2014 even after the surgery record page No. 200,” and “D hospital’s results of the everative genetic testing conducted against the Plaintiff on June 16, 2015.” The everative everative everative everative everative everative everative ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever e.

arrow