logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2012. 10. 25. 선고 2012두14576 판결
(심리불속행) 유류 판매업자인 원고가 교부받은 세금계산서는 공급자가 허위로 기재된 사실과 다른 세금계산서에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Busan High Court (Chowon) 201Nu221 (Law No. 31, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2010Du0996 ( October 17, 2010)

Title

(1) A tax invoice received by the Plaintiff, who is an oil distributor, shall constitute a false tax invoice on the facts entered falsely by the supplier.

Summary

(b) The Plaintiff’s tax invoice, which was delivered to the Plaintiff, constitutes a tax invoice different from the fact entered falsely by the supplier, and it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff was not aware of the fact that the Plaintiff was not aware of such fact, and thus, the disposition imposing the input tax amount was lawful.

Related statutes

Article 17 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

2012du14576 The revocation of the disposition to impose value-added tax.

Plaintiff-Appellant

XX

Defendant-Appellee

Kim Jong-soo

Judgment of the lower court

Busan High Court (Chowon) Decision 2011Nu221 Decided May 31, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the assertion on the grounds of appeal by the appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final

arrow