logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.03.22 2013고단220
사기
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 4,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 6,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 4,000,000 won.

Reasons

On January 18, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.), and the judgment on January 26, 2003 became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants and E’s fraud Defendants and the aforementioned E conspired with insufficient living expenses after leaving the country. On September 2012, on the Internet homepage, etc. from “F” located near the Ajin Station in Gangdong-gu Seoul, Gangdong-gu, Seoul after searching for the victim, Defendant A conspired to receive money from the victim by receiving money from the victim, Defendant A’s role of opening an account for receiving money from the victim, Defendant B’s role of telephoneing the victim to the victim, Defendant C’s role of informing the victim to purchase goods by physical coloring the victim, and the above E intended to receive money from the victim by sending his cell phone to the Defendant B.

On September 10, 2012, the Defendants posted a letter to the effect that they will buy a middle Kameras on the Internet website at the PC bank located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwangjin-gu Automatic, the Defendants made a false call to the victims G, who called “(1) 8,300,000 won deposited.”

However, at the time of fact, the defendants did not have a f0 camera, so even if they received money from the victim, they did not have the intention or ability to sell it.

In collusion with the above E, the Defendants, by deceiving the victim as such, received 830,000 won from the victim to the post office account (H) under the name of the Defendant A for the price of goods at that time.

2. Defendant B and E’s fraud Defendant and the above E are arrested by the police on September 17, 2012, following the arrest of Defendant B and E on a separate basis, the Defendant colored the victim who would buy goods via the Internet using the above post office check in the name of the Defendant A, and E.

arrow