beta
Text
Defendant
A A Fines of 5 million won, Defendant B and C of each fine of 3 million won, Defendant D and E of each fine of 1 million won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 26, 2019, the Defendants: (a) purchased the name of his father and delivered to F with BMW 520d car in the name of investment by Defendant A around March 26, 2019; (b) confirmed through GPS that the said car was parked in the victim H and J’s “J” restaurant operated by the victim H and I in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu; and (c) brought about the said car.
Defendants were refused to demand the return of the said BMW 520d car at the above restaurant from around 10:40 on March 26, 2019 to around 16:58 on the same day from around 10:40 on the same day to the above restaurant, and Defendant A, B, and C were able to take time to customers who have been in the restaurant and take a bath, and display their letters to the victims who have prevented them, and “hump, hump, hump, hump, hump, hump. hump.
D. The Defendant D, and E were able to avoid disturbance, such as: (a) parked 2 vehicles on board at the entrance and parking lot of a restaurant; (b) string the light at a large level; and (c) hinging down trees located in the relevant parking lot in a hacks, and hinging the said BMW 520d car; and (d) hing down a disturbance, such as creating a hiversity and hinginginginging the surrounding areas, and returning to the surrounding areas.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the restaurant business of victims by force.
2. On March 26, 2019, the Defendants were demanded from the victim H and I to make a disturbance as described in paragraph (1) at the places described in paragraph (1) at around 11:30 on March 26, 2019 and to request the victim H and I to leave the restaurant.
However, the Defendants did not comply with this and were dispatched to the police officer by the victim's report at around 16:58 on the same day until he is arrested as a flagrant offender, and they did not leave without justifiable reasons.
As a result, Defendants jointly leave the victims.
The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. H, I, and K.