logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2020.07.16 2019나39960
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of adding a part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance and adding a judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion, and this court’s reasoning is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, thereby citing it in accordance with the main sentence of

[고쳐쓰는 부분] ◎ 제1의

(b) subsection (1) shall be added to:

(1) On June 2016, Plaintiff C consulted with N in connection with K performance. On June 28, 2016, N sent a written estimate that calculated the cost of KRW 50,456,000, based on the total number of 35 persons, to Plaintiff C. The employees of Plaintiff C sent the e-mail to the Plaintiff, who was dispatched to Plaintiff C as N’s employee, requesting a written estimate of KRW 1,50,000,000, raised the budget amount as follows, and theO sent the said e-mail to N.

◎ 제1의

(b) subsection (3) shall be added to:

(3) On January 201, 2017, Plaintiff D received a request from the Director General of QK on the part of hostinging the events returning to Korea, and children, members of the choir, who were members of the choir, had Q increase the fireworks from the airport to Q, and operated R, which is a Q support group.

◎ 제1의

C. (6) The Plaintiff’s phone call to Defendant F shall be “The Plaintiff D shall use the phone call to Defendant F via Plaintiff C’s employees.”

◎ 제1의

F. (1) The Plaintiff’s “Plaintiff C” in paragraph (1) was committed against Z on March 10, 2018, with “17 members of the choir, against Z on March 30, 2018.”

(그 외 원고들이 제1심판결의 사실인정에 오류가 있음을 지적하는 부분의 경우, 원고들이 제출한 증거들로는 원고들이 주장하는 사실관계가 진실에 부합한다거나 제1심판결의 사실인정이 잘못되었다고 보기 부족하다.) ◎ 제2항의 ‘원고가’를 ‘원고들이’로, ‘원고는’을 ‘원고들은’으로 고쳐쓴다.

[Supplementary Parts]

1. The Plaintiffs’ remarks directly cited in each of the instant reports are made by the Defendants.

arrow