logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.05.01 2017누80259
국가유공자(공상군경)요건일부결정통보처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Under the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment, the following is added to the "the point of receiving medical treatment" of the 7th sentence. (4) The plaintiff is now 74 years old as 1946 old as her birth. The light signboards disability accompanied by the nephalphalopic disease of this case seems to frequently occur to a person of a age group similar to that of this case due to departure due to age increase. Under the fourth sentence of the first instance judgment, the "it is insufficient to recognize that there was an injury caused by the instant accident" of the 7th and 8th sentence as follows.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow