logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.11.29 2018누43240
유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is the same as the part of the first instance judgment in addition to the following parts: therefore, it shall accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion that the disposition of this case is legitimate and that the disposition of this case should be revoked illegally). On the fourth part of the first instance judgment, the court of first instance dismissed the Plaintiff’s assertion that the “F Hospital” in the first instance judgment was “E Hospital” in the “E Hospital,” and the evidence submitted in the first instance judgment was re-examined along with the Plaintiff’s assertion that it is difficult to acknowledge a proximate causal relationship between the deceased’s work and the death, even if the Plaintiff re-examines the evidence.

Under the fourth sentence of the judgment of the first instance, the "astronomical letter" of the first instance shall be raised to "astronomical letter".

The 7th, 7th, 8th, 10th, 8th, 11th, and 7th, each "this Court" is all dismissed as "the first instance court".

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow