Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, this decision is delivered to the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A has overall control over the operation of the game site as the business owner of the F Game site in E, and Defendant B took charge of the above game site employees and the fund management, etc. under the direction of Defendant A, and G (Suspension of Prosecution on the same day) is an employee of the game site in question, who is an employee of the game site in question.

No one shall engage in the business of converting into money or arranging exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Nevertheless, from October 17, 2016 to December 26, 2016, the Defendants and G installed 112 games in the sum of 25 U.S. game software in the F-si E in the following F-si: (a) 30 U.S. game software; (b) 30 U.S. Mado Man-si game software; (c) 25 game software in the “Kando” game; and (d) 25 games in the “Kando” game software; (b) unspecified customers requested customers to put the said game in cash in the said game machine and refund the game scores obtained by carrying the game; and (c) they made cash exchange after deducting 20% from the fee.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with G to exchange tangible and intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Copy of business registration certificate;

1. Contents of letters sent by I to Handphones;

1. The CD and recording recording in which the exchange content is recorded (the Defendants only purchased the game scores of 50,00 won to H for Defendant B to play the game, which is irrelevant to Defendant A. Therefore, the Defendants did not engage in the business of exchanging the game scores. However, the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, i.e., H continued exchange in the game of this case.