logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2014.12.05 2014고합491
공직선거법위반
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,200,000, and a fine of KRW 1,200,000.

2. The above fines shall be imposed on the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B are supported by E registered as a preliminary candidate for the head of the Gu in the 6 simultaneous local elections implemented on June 4, 2014.

Except as otherwise provided for in the Public Official Election Act, no election campaign shall be carried out by propaganda facilities and tools or various printed materials, broadcasting, newspapers, news communications, magazines, other publications, campaign meetings, debate meetings, native folks meetings, alumni meetings, neighbors' meetings, other meetings, information and communications, the establishment of an election organization or private organization, door-to-door visits and other methods prior to the election campaign period.

1. On April 1, 2014, from around 15:29 to 18:46, Defendant A, at the election office of the head of the D head of the Gu, who was located in the 8th floor of Daegu Suwon-gu F building, sent his phone phone phone phone phone calls to the electorate to obtain the election of E, and asked for a preliminary candidate to inform the electors of the candidate for the ED head of the ED. The Defendant asked for a preliminary candidate for the ED head. The phone calls for support from the ED head. 63 times.

Accordingly, the defendant carried out an election campaign in a way that is not prescribed by the Public Official Election Act before the election campaign period.

2. Defendant B: (a) from March 31, 2014 to April 18:4, 2014, from around 15:04 to April 1, 2014, the Defendant phoneed to his/her cell phone electors for the purpose of winning E in the election campaign office; (b) and (c) asked to inform his/her voters of the preliminary candidate for the E head of the ED head; (c) asked to request the gender of the preliminary candidate for the E head of the ED head; and (d) asked the head of the ED head of the E head of the ED head of the Gu to seek support from E more than 127 times.

Accordingly, the defendant carried out an election campaign in a way that is not prescribed by the Public Official Election Act before the election campaign period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. Each legal statement of a witness G, H, I, J, K, and L;

1. Each police statement made to M, N, G, H, and J;

1. Each written confirmation of theO or K;

1.Each.

arrow