1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The party status network E (hereinafter “the deceased”) is a deceased person who received treatment at a F Hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”). The Plaintiff is the wife of the deceased, the Plaintiff B, and C. The deceased’s children.

B. 1) On July 23, 2010, the Deceased was provided with medical treatment at the Defendant Hospital, and was provided with workplace cancer diagnosis at the Defendant Hospital on October 14, 2010. 2) After which the Deceased was provided with workplace cancer surgery at the Defendant Hospital, the Deceased continued to observe the progress on a regular basis at the Defendant Hospital. However, there was no opinion on the transfer of workplace cancer in the chest radiation examination and CT examination conducted on May 6, 201, but there was no opinion on the fact that the termination of workplace cancer was doubtful as a result of the inspection conducted on December 7, 2011.

As a result, on December 12, 201, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital observed ional disease, etc. in front areas (2 x 1.5 cm), left leaves (1 x 5 cm), left leaves (1.5 cm), left leaves (2.4 x 1.9 cm), front areas of left leaves (2.3 x 1.7 cm), left leaves (2 x 2 cm), left leaves (2 cm), both sides leaves (4 cm below 1 cm respectively).

Accordingly, the medical team of the Defendant Hospital decided to discharge the Deceased at intervals of one month after the first operation and to implement the second operation at intervals of one month.

3) On December 21, 201, the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s medical personnel, through scarfly scarflying and scarflying on the right side side side of the deceased (hereinafter “the first operation”).

AB implemented the first operation, inserting one chest on the part of the first operation, and making a transitional observation. On December 27, 2011 and December 28, 2011, the air leakage in the part of the operation continued.

Since then, the medical professionals in the defendant hospital confirmed that air leakage has decreased, and removed a chest on December 30, 201, and it shows opinions on January 1, 201, again, on January 2, 2012.