logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.03.29 2017고정2211
재물손괴
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 25, 2017, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the elevator door by a method of cutting off the elevator door, without any reason under the influence of alcohol, from the 112-1-3 Rale Park C apartment at the Gyeonggi-si on May 25, 2017.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case, the defendant, on the day of this case, returned to his own residence on the 15th floor of the apartment house of this case at around 01:03, after getting on the elevator of this case at around 01:03, and returned to the elevator with the 15th floor, and the inside door of the elevator was admitted two times.

Accordingly, the circumstances acknowledged by the record, i.e., (i) D, an employee of the apartment management office of this case, confirmed that the elevator outside entrance of the elevator 112 dong-12 dong-3, around 08:50 on the day of this case and reported to the police, and related to the above passenger board fishing even in photograph and estimate of damage submitted to the investigation agency, and therefore, it was specified that the Defendant damaged the elevator entrance, i.e., the passenger board fishing part by the passenger board., the charge of this case.

할 것인 점, ② 이 사건 당일 공동 현관에서 촬영된 CCTV 영상에 의하면, 피고인이 엘리베이터에 탑승하기 전에 피고인의 몸이 뒤로 밀리는 것과 같은 모습이 촬영되어 있기는 하나( 엘리베이터 앞쪽은 위 CCTV가 비추지 않는 부분으로 촬영되어 있지 않다), 그러한 사정만으로 피고인이 엘리베이터 출입문을 발로 찼을 것이라고 단정하기는 어려운 점, ③ D은 이 법정에서, 이 사건 당일 엘리베이터 승 장 도어 부분만 찌그러진 것을 확인하였고 엘리베이터 내부 문에는 특별한 이상이 없었다고

In full view of the facts stated, the evidence produced by the prosecutor alone proves that the defendant destroyed the elevator entrance by breaking up the entrance door of the elevator without reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see it.

3. As such, the facts charged in this case are concluded.

arrow