Defendant

Punishment B against the defendant A shall be one year, and the punishment against the defendant A shall be seven million won, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A Co., Ltd. is a corporation that runs the construction business in Yeongdeungpo-gu C building in Suwon-si, the construction business in subparagraph D, and a business owner who performs the work for improving toilets in F High School in Gyeonggi-do by being awarded a contract for approximately KRW 503,906,900 from the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education, and is obligated to take safety measures to prevent the industrial accidents of workers employed at the above construction site. Defendant B is the head of the site management office in charge of the safety management of the construction site in this case and is the person responsible for safety and health management who has the duty

On the other hand, victim G (G, 40 years of age) is a worker belonging to Defendant A corporation.

1. Defendant B

A. On July 21, 2018, around 09:25, the Defendant, following the death of the victim, instructed the victim to remove the windows mold from the outside capital of the four-story toilets at the construction site of this case.

When a business owner carries out an operation at the risk of falling or falling off material objects, or which is likely to fall, he/she shall pay safety caps to workers, and when he/she carries out dismantling operations, such as buildings, he/she shall conduct a prior investigation into the topography, ground-to-ground conditions, etc. of the relevant workplace and record and preserve the results thereof in order to prevent any danger to workers, he/she shall take into consideration the results thereof, prepare a work plan in accordance with the relevant plan, and have workers do work in accordance with the relevant plan, and where there is a risk that workers might fall or fall, or where there is any concern that workers might do work in a place where they fall or fall, machinery, equipment, block,

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not pay a safety cap to the victim, did not prepare a work plan, and did not install a work tag.

Ultimately, the Defendant is as above.