logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.10.19 2016고단2192
업무방해등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than two months and by imprisonment for not more than ten months with prison labor for the remaining crimes.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On September 10, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for six months with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in Busan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 18th of the same month.

【Criminal Facts】

"2016 Highest 2192"

1. On June 1, 2015, at around 15:10 on June 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the victim D (year 25) in Busan Northern-gu C (year 25) was drunk while smoking tobacco at a national bank E branch where the police assigned for special guard was working; (b) the Defendant expressed that the Defendant was able to fluencing on the back of the counter of the bank, “the Defendant was flucing to die and return to the scirls”; and (c) flucing the tobacco that the Defendant was asked to leave from the victim, and obstructed the victim’s normal banking maintenance business by inserting the victim’s employees and customers at around 10 minutes of working.

"2016 Highest 3691"

2. On July 2, 2016, around 18:17, 2016, the Defendant was boarding a G-business taxi operated by the victim F with no intent or ability to pay the taxi fee on the front of the Daedodok-ro 29-ro 27, Busan, Gangseo-gu, Busan, and caused the victim to operate the said taxi until the front of the 6 chemical area in Busan, and did not pay 13,000 won of the taxi fee.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

"2016 Highest 3948"

3. On June 29, 2016, at around 20:00, the Defendant: (a) expressed the attitude that the Defendant would pay the victim’s drinking value at the “J” point of the “J” position of the victim I on the first floor of HH in Busan Dong-gu, Busan; and (b) ordered liquor.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the drinking value.

The Defendant received property equivalent to KRW 30,000,000, total market value of KRW 10,000 from the victim’s 5 Macju equivalent to the market value of KRW 20,000,00 from the victim’s false statement.

In this respect, the defendant deceivings the victim to take property.

arrow