logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.09.16 2015고단370
상해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 5, 2014, at the location of Paragraph 1, the Defendant, knowing that the said victim had contacted with D and was in contact with Jeonnam, and subsequently, posted a statement on his own smartphone Kakaooto Ri, stating, “E is short of a photograph-flame, v. N., no such peta, and a Rape sexual assaulting sexual intercourse,” and publicly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution (one time);

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a Kakakao Scarogle photograph;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (In cases of the punishment of a fine: Consideration of the motive, content, etc. of the crime in this case);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Facts charged;

A. At around 19:00 on June 13, 2014, the injured Defendant collected a beer to the victim F (F (F, 32 years of age) who is the wife of the child, on the ground that he was born from H 603 of the H 603 located in Busan Jin-gu, Busan, Busan, and 4 months after birth. On the hand floor of the hand, the Defendant saw the victim into a multi-face of the inner part in need of approximately three weeks of treatment.

B. Around 20:00 on July 12, 2014, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by stating that “F is a body of the said victim only once the peta, and there is no proper human being inside the house.”

2. Determination:

A. The victim F’s statement is flexible as evidence directly supporting this part of the facts charged.

However, in full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by each evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the credibility of the victim’s statement is recognized.

arrow