1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case to be cited as follows. Thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 4

[Supplementary parts] The 10th 2nd 2nd 2nd to 4th 2nd 1st 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3

2) Since the extension of the construction period of this case was due to the delay of commencement, the calculation of indirect costs shall comply with Article 29(3) of the Special Conditions.

Article 29(1) of the Special Conditions applies mutatis mutandis only to the case where the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed on the settlement of indirect costs and the standards for actual expenses stipulated in the aforesaid provision are ambiguous, and thus, the invalidity of Article 29(1) of the Special Conditions does not affect the validity of the instant settlement agreement, and further, Article 29(1) of the Special Conditions cannot be deemed null and void.

"The plaintiff seems not to have extended the construction period as above" of the 11th to 12th of the 11th of the 11th of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th "the plaintiff alleged that the 219th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th of the "the 11th of the 11th of the 11th of the 11st of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th of the 12th of the 11th of the 11th of the 12th of the 11th of the 11th of the 12th of the 12th of the "the 12th of the 12th of the 196th of the 196th of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 2nd of the 3th of the 3th of the construction.