1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added in the trial are dismissed, respectively.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part concerning the software mutual aid association for co-defendants of the court of first instance as follows; and (b) such part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

The actual contents of the tax shall be as shown in Form 1 of the first instance judgment: Attached Form 9.

3. The description of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes.

Attached Form

2. The description of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

2. Determination

A. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this part of the plaintiff's assertion is as follows 3. A. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts.

Since the plaintiff's assertion is the same as a claim (the plaintiff's assertion), it is quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 11 of the decision of the first instance court: Article 29 (1) 5 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 4 (1) 5 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, and Article 4 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 11 of the decision of the first instance: 5 of the first instance court, which relaxed the requirements of the enterpriser's right to cancel or terminate the right to cancel under Acts, or relaxed the requirements of the enterpriser's right to cancel or terminate the right to cancel under Acts: Article 4 (1) 5 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 29 (1) 5 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 4 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 10 of the decision of the first instance court, and Article 4 of the General Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 4 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 29 (1) 5 of the General Terms and Conditions of Integrity Agreement, Article 12 through 14 of the decision of the first instance court, are as follows:

“2” From December 16, 201 to December 31, 2011, the following day after the Defendant notified the termination of the instant long-term contract, the Plaintiff provided all patent net system management services under the instant contract. As such, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 177,134,150, which is the service price unpaid during the said period, and damages for delay.