The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Sentencing sentencing on the gist of reasons for appeal

2. The appellate court’s judgment is reasonable to respect the first-class sentencing judgment in a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first-class judgment, and the first-class sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

The fact that the defendant acknowledges and reflects the crime, the victim paid medical expenses, the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant, the victim does not unilaterally inflict an injury on the victim, and the basic recipient is suffering from severe disability.

However, in light of the degree, degree, and result of the defendant's injury, it is disadvantageous to the defendant that the nature of the crime of this case is not weak, and that the defendant can have the same kind of violent crimes.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the commission of the crime, means, and result of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment cannot be deemed to be unfair due to excessive fault, and otherwise, the lower court’s sentencing conditions stated earlier have changed in the trial.

There are no circumstances to see.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.