logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.11.28 2018노2089
전자금융거래법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Sentencing the sentencing of the grounds for appeal (the sentence of the lower court: a fine of 2,00,000 won);

2. The appellate court’s judgment is reasonable to respect the first-class sentencing judgment in a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first-class judgment, and the first-class sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion.

All of the crimes of this case are recognized and reflected by the defendant, the defendant has a 4-class visual disorder, the defendant's health condition is not good, the defendant's economic situation is also good, or it is advantageous to the fact that the defendant can be used for the crime, but the transfer of access media is unfavorable.

As above, taking into account the favorable or unfavorable circumstances of the defendant, and taking into account the defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the crime, means and consequence, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed unfair due to excessive circumstances.

Unlike the fact that the sentencing conditions have been changed in the court;

There are no circumstances to see.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow