Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 23:50 on August 27, 2013, the victim C (55 years of age) who is an acting engineer in the Seo-gu Seo-gu B Apartment, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, did not properly park the vehicle; (b) was called “spawn and spawn” to the victim C; and (c)

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim C.

2. On August 28, 2013, at the E District District located in Gwangju, Gwangju, about 00:15, the Defendant said, “A police officer F (the age of 51) belonging to the said District, who is a police officer and a proxy driver C under paragraph (1), who is in charge of the assault,” the Defendant said that “the victim F (the age of 51) of the said District F (the age of 51), who is a victim of the said District, is the victim of the assaulted incident”, “low, chrone’s flaf, flaf’s flaf, flaf’s flaf, and flaf’s flaf’s flaf, flaf’s flaf, and flaf’s f

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of each police protocol to F and C

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine in regard to the facts constituting an offense, the choice of a penalty, and the choice of a fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant assaulted a substitute driver without any particular reason while under the influence of alcohol, and imprisoned a police officer by failing to stop the act of disturbance while going to the earth, and then insulting him. The defendant repeated the crime of this case even though he had been punished three times by a fine due to the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. in the past, etc. Act, it is deemed that the defendant requires strict punishment. However, it is deemed that the defendant repented and reflected his mistake, and the defendant did not have any criminal record other than three times of the above fine, and the defendant was under the influence of alcohol.