A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final.

Punishment of the crime

around 00:45 on December 8, 2013, the Defendant was punished for trial expenses due to taxi charges in front of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

In the presence of E and F, etc., the victim D, the Inspector belonging to the Seoul Gangseo Police Station C District, who was dispatched after receiving a report, openly insultd the victim by saying, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “I am frithly, I am frithly, I am frist, I am frist, I am hyst, and am hyst,” and then arrested and moved to a flagrant offender, and 10 police officers, such as E, in the above C District, are located within the said C District.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The sentence shall be determined as shown in the order, taking into consideration the fact that even though the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act was two times during the last four years, the record of fines for the same kind of crime was committed again, a large number of records of violent crimes, and the risk of recidivism seems to be high;