logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2015.04.15 2014나1378
공사대금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with B, who is called the Defendant’s on-site director, to pay KRW 64.9 million, the remainder of the contract amount as KRW 50 million as the advance payment, on April 30, 2012, for each of the construction works indicated “the first subcontract” as indicated in the table “the first subcontract” (hereinafter “the entire construction work in this case”), such as electric power line installation works, etc., as indicated below, and on May 23, 2012, the Defendant, subcontractor, the Plaintiff, and the construction period were from April 30, 2012 to May 25, 2012; and the contract amount was KRW 129,90,000,000,000 as the remainder of the contract amount was to be paid within 10 days after the completion of the construction work (hereinafter “the first subcontract”) and the additional subcontract was to be paid within KRW 2500,000,00,00,000 for each of the two subcontracteds.

(hereinafter referred to as the “Secondary Subcontract”. The first subcontract [129,80,00 won = the supply price of 118,00,00 won = value of value of value 111,80,000 value-added tax] x 2.66% re-insurance premium = labor cost x 7% x general management cost and general management cost and profit x 94% x 10% x 36%, but it does not have any value of the expenses for the first electric power installation 9,205, 2032, 30, 32, 826, 241, 243, 247, 396, 205, 396, 207, 306, 205, 306, 306, 194, 205, 306, 306, 194, 2014, 208

arrow