The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant was a victim C (V, 52 years old) and a person who married around 2004 and divorced around 2014, but was aware of the fact that when the Defendant terminated the insurance that the victim joined as the insured, the Defendant would be paid a refund of KRW 1 million for termination.

On November 25, 2017, around 12:03 on November 25, 2017, the Defendant demanded the victim to use his/her mobile phone in his/her dwelling in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu D and 102, and to terminate the said insurance and to bring about KRW 1 million upon termination of the said insurance. However, the Defendant was refused from the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendant: (a) sought to find out to the victim that he would be able to die by opening these weathers of the same year and close the E store door; (b) if he knows at the time of the horse-tending and doing so, he she can shotly shotly fling the match; (c) he she can do so at present, and (d) he can do so at present, she can frightly frightening frightening frighting frightening frightening frighting frightening frighting frightening frightening frightening frighting frightening frighting frightening frighting frightening frighting frightening frighting frightening frighting frighting frighting frighting frighten.”

Maz.

1. Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

2. According to the application for non-prosecution of punishment submitted by a defense counsel, the injured person has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the accused.

3. Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act