logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2017.08.09 2016고단840
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was that the Defendant, on January 1, 2014, operated a Korean language education project against foreigners under the trade name “D” in the Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C Building 310, but the project has deteriorated, the Defendant offered funds to the victims E to use them for the purpose of using the said project funds and personal debt repayment, etc.

On January 2014, the Defendant stated to the effect that, in the foregoing office, the Defendant paid KRW 50,000,000 to the Plaintiff for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant: (b) provided the Korean language education program to the victims of the foregoing office against the four-pact foreigners who wish to be employed in Korea using the Korean language language language; (c) provided that the Defendant paid KRW 50,00,000 to the Plaintiff for the payment of KRW 50,00 in return, by transferring the right to operate the Korean Language Institute in the Korean language located in the Republic of Korea, and providing the Korean instructors.

However, at the time, the Defendant did not enter into a contract on the supply of instructors to the Korea Development Institute located in the territory of the Republic of Korea and the Korea Development Institute located in the territory of the Republic of Korea and the Korea Development Institute located in the territory of the Republic of Korea, which provides instructors to the Korean language education for foreigners staying in the Republic of Korea. The Defendant did not have any specific plan to provide the victims with the Korean language instructors, and there was no intention or ability to provide the victims with support, such as providing the Korean language instructors to the Korean language education in the Republic of Korea for the victims, since there was no specific plan to provide the victims with the Korean language instructors.

On February 6, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 1,00,000,000 under the name of the Defendant’s agricultural bank account (Account Number G) under the name of the Defendant on February 6, 2014, KRW 10,000 on March 14, 2014, KRW 18,200,00 on April 15, 2014, and KRW 20,000 on May 28, 2014, respectively, and acquired KRW 49,20,000 on a total by transfer.

2. Determination:

A. In a criminal trial, there is room for a judge to make a reasonable doubt of conviction.

arrow