The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendants are those who are in the same university-friendly relationship.

A. Defendant B: (a) around September 22, 2016, around 22:20, the Defendant: (a) sought SNS dong images from SNS dong images to be proneed by one horse of the victim A; (b) sought SNS dong images to be a part of the victim’s face; (c) took the victim’s head head debt at one time; (d) took the victim’s body in drinking; (e) took the victim’s body at one time; (e) took the victim’s body in drinking; and (e) assaulted the victim at one time due to knekne, walkinging the victim at one time; and (e) assaulted the victim at one time.

B. Defendant A, in opposition to the assault of the victim B, committed the assault of the victim as set forth in the preceding paragraph, with the head of the victim’s hair, and assaulted the victim when taking the face of the victim by drinking.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are all crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In doing so, according to each agreement and the Defendants’ legal statement, it is evident that the Defendants expressed their intent not to punish each other. Thus, the Defendants are dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition.