beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On September 22, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D, who posted a notice of “purchase of e-mail electronic books” on the Internet bulletin board of NAV C and 301 at the Defendant’s home located in Busan Northern-gu C and 301, and “on the first hand, he will send e-mail devices if he transfers e-mail.”
However, the defendant did not have the above goods at the time, and even if he received the payment from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to sell the above goods.
The Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above; (b) received 55,000 won from the Saemaul Treasury account (Account Number E) in his name on the same day as the purchase price from the victim; and (c) received a total of eight times from November 15, 2017, including transfer of KRW 1,195,000 from that to that of November 15, 2017 by means of the aforementioned method, as shown in the List of Crimes.
"2018 Highest 1245"
1. On April 28, 2018, the Defendant made a false statement that he/she would send a book to the account when he/she first transfers money to the account, on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant reported that the Victim F would purchase the applied neological books to the Internet NAV and the country car page; and (b) the Defendant had a book to contact the victim to purchase the applied neological books; and (c) the Defendant attempted to send money to the account.
However, the Defendant did not have the above liability, and even if the victim remitted money, he did not have the intent or ability to sell the book.
Nevertheless, by deceiving the victim, 65,000 won was remitted from the victim to the Saemaul Treasury Account (G) in the name of the defendant on the same day.
2. On May 3, 2018, the Defendant: (a) filed a franchise card with the victim H purchasing two Samsung franchise cards on the Internet NAVV and the Korean car page; and (b) transferred money to the account first, because the Defendant had a franchise card to contact the victim.