A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2016, the Defendant forged official document: (a) a copy of D’s specialized construction business registration certificate signed and sealed by the official seal of the head of the Cheongwon-gu Office, Seocho-gu, 101 Dong 1213, Dongwon-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-gu, Cheongju-gu, with a copy of D’s specialized construction business registration certificate signed by the official seal of the head of the Cheongwon-gu, Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju-gu; (b) a type of business column, “A”, “A”, “Y”, “Y”, “Y”, “Y-gu, Cheongbuk-gu,

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged one copy of a specialized construction business registration certificate in the name of the head of the Seo-gu Office, Seo-ju, who is an official document.

2. On October 24, 2016, the Defendant presented a false official document construction registration certificate, which is a forged official document, to a staff member of the management office in the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Jung-gu apartment management office, Jung-gu, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City, along with bidding-related documents, as if it were actually issued.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of statutes on specialized construction business registration certificates;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 25 of the Official Document) and Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (the point of uttering of forged official document);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the criminal is being committed, the fact that there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine, and the fact that the intended purpose has not been achieved);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act of the community service order;