The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case reveals that the Defendant: (a) a member of the organization of telephone financial fraud in the name of the victim (hereinafter “Singing”) misrepresented the victim with telephone calls; (b) received money transferred without permission from the victim using the financial transaction information provided by the victim; and (c) remitted the money to another account used by the Sing organization; or (d) waits in order to receive the money obtained by deceptive, in compliance with the instructions of the persons who suffered no name, in order to receive the money, to assist in committing the crime of the Sing organization.

At around 12:30 on May 17, 2018, the person whose name was omitted calls from the victim B to the victim B, and “B is a prosecutor of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office C. BC was involved in the identity theft case. It is necessary to confirm whether BC is a victim or a criminal. It is necessary to confirm whether BC is a victim or a criminal. We have access to the notification of URL. It is called the establishment of a cyber safety country fishing case. In this context, I have access to the notification of UTRL. After being issued with the OTP machinery by the main bank, I would like to inform the six fpboards appearing in the OTP machinery.”

However, the above person under whose name the victim was the member of the criminal organization of Bophishing who misrepresented the inspection, and the victim identified the financial transaction information necessary for the principal bank account and Internet banking from the victim, and then was thought to be exempted from the victim's deposit.

After deceiving the victim as such, the statement of financial transaction information and the password created by the OTP on the victim's bank account (E) were identified. On 14:48 of the same day, the victim's above financial transaction information of the victim was entered into the Internet banking website of the Korea bank and acquired pecuniary benefits by transferring the victim's above financial transaction information of KRW 12 million to the G Union (H) account in the name of the F, and the defendant was waiting to receive the above money to be withdrawn by F from the I in the name of the Republic of Korea.