logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.20 2015고단161
컴퓨터등사용사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence 1 to 6 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, as a person who is acting in Korea under the direction of a person who is the general responsibility of the telephone financial fraud organization in China, was engaged in activities in China, and the person whose name was not known to China, conspired to acquire property from many unspecified domestic victims by using telephone financial fraud in order to take part in the role of deceiving victims and informing them of financial transaction information at the public prosecutor's office or other government agencies at a place where it is impossible to identify China, and then transfer money from the victims' financial account to the financial account that they manage. The Defendant acquired another person's passbook, cash card, etc. from a person who was not known, and delivered it to the person designated by the above person who was not entitled to receive the above name card (one name card delivery note), or to withdraw the damaged amount after receiving the information deposited as the damaged amount, and transfer the money deposited as the damaged amount to the Chinese accomplices (one name card delivery note).

1. On December 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with the above-mentioned nameless winners; (b) called the victim C (or the age of 25) by phone calls around 12:30 on December 29, 2014; and (c) used the passbook for the crime of fraud, etc. by using the passbook to make it available to the victim C (or the age of 25). Since the correspondence cannot be known as a criminal, it must be proven that the victim is not a criminal and is not a criminal. It shall be confirmed that he/she entered the site of the Supreme Prosecutors’ Office." On the part of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, the Defendant made the victim access to the Internet site of the false Supreme Prosecutor’s Office. (c) notified the victim as if the case was actually received, and believed to be true, received financial information, such as the victim’s bank account number (D) and confidential (OTP) number from the victim by telephone.

A person with poor name in China is entitled to use financial information identified as above from the victim's City bank account.

arrow