logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.10.29 2020고단4427
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On June 22, 201, at the Daegu District Court, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and on October 9, 2012, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). On August 21, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) by the same court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 19:50 on July 24, 2020, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the measurement) demanded that the Defendant comply with a drinking test by inserting alcohol in a manner of inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument, on the ground that there is a reason to recognize that the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, and drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, and drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, and drinking alcohol, drinking alcohol, driving at the 7rd city Agricultural Technology Center in the city of Busan at the city of Busan at the end of the city of Busan at the end of July 24, 2020, while driving BM3 automobiles at the front of the 112 vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for a drinking test without a justifiable reason by evading a drinking test throughout about 16 minutes.

2. On July 4, 2020, at around 20:15, the Defendant refused to measure drinking at the same place as indicated in paragraph (1) at the same time as indicated in paragraph (1), and spits, spits, laid down spits, or spits, and assaulted E face of the police box of the Gyeongsan National Police Station that prevents this.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Notification of the control results of drinking driving, and report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Place of service;

1. A previous conviction: A statement of inquiry results and a summary order;

arrow