A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

350,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The amount equivalent to the above additional charges.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a director of the Engineering Headquarters Technical Team at present C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and from October 201 to January 2014, 201, the Defendant was in charge of the work of managing the design and construction of water-proof removal equipment construction works from the smokestack removal factory of the above FC Section 2 factories ordered by C while working as the director of the F-Posib Team in charge of the construction of the construction of the facilities of the 2 plant in the process of heating and disassembly E (State) fccadb located in Ulsan-gu, Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu.

On the other hand, F is a person who operated (ju)G which is a design and manufacturer company of plant environmental facilities in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and received major installation works (hereinafter "main construction works") from the above white smoke removal works around April 1, 2013. At the time, F was pointed out that the size of the company is too small from the Defendant at the time, HH’s regular director of the wastewater treatment specialized company (ju) who was introduced through the branch manager around the end of 2012 and the form of this construction contract, H agreed that H entered into a subcontract contract between H and the above (ju) with the construction cost of KRW 2.930 million for the construction cost of the construction from C. In response, H acquired KRW 293 million equivalent to 100 million of the construction cost.

1. (State) On May 8, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 50 million from the representative F, along with an unlawful solicitation, to the effect that “K” from F to the effect that “it does not point out the problems while supervising and supervising the construction of white smoke removal facilities in the process of construction in our company and at the construction period, convenience is changed so that the construction can be completed within the construction period.”

2. (State) The Defendant received KRW 300 million from HI to F on August 2013, 201, for the reason that there was a defect equivalent to KRW 6-700 million in the construction process of the 00 million removal facility at the “F”, and the cost of repair of the defect is KRW 300 million.