A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

【Completion of the Construction Project】 The victim C is the owner of the urban-type residential housing (the 6th floor and the 28th unit units above the ground) located in Jung-Eup-Eup.

The victim entered into the first contract with E, but E renounced the present construction due to the aggravation of funds. On March 2014, 2014, after entering into the said contract with F, the Defendant: (a) had been performing the instant construction with F, and (b) had also submitted a waiver of the present construction under the agreement with the victim on May 1, 2014 due to the aggravation of funds.

Since then the construction has been undertaken with G

H agreed to undertake the instant construction project, but due to the financial problem, the victim was excluded from the construction project due to the conflict with the victim. Ultimately, the victim had the intention to proceed the construction project directly with the victim after changing only the name of the contractor. On May 27, 2014, the victim changed the name of the contractor from I to I and completed the construction project while entering into the construction contract with the subcontractor.

【The Defendant’s role and position at the construction site of this case】 On March 21, 2014, the Defendant introduced F of the actual operator of the above G through the above H on March 21, 2014, and received benefits from F from that time, and served as the site warden at the construction site of this case. As such, the Defendant left the construction site of this case due to the aggravation of the Fund, and the Defendant continued to work as the site warden upon receiving benefits from H.

Since then, after H was excluded from the construction of the instant case, the victim called the Defendant, on-site staff J, K, etc., who is the head of the site, “I would no longer directly manage the instant construction work,” but the Defendant requested the victim to continue to work as the victim did not continue to work for a long time, and the Defendant accepted this request, and the Defendant continues to work as on-site warden and JK as field employees.