logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.07.12 2017고단1748
채권의공정한추심에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, by a fine of 2,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. The Defendant in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act lent cash to the victim D (the age of 33) over several occasions from December 2014 to January 2017. However, if the Defendant failed to receive some of the amount, and the victim was granted hot water to the victim, and at around 13:48 on March 10, 2017 and around 13:55 on March 13:48, 2017, the Defendant was sent to the victim using the Defendant’s mobile phone to enter the victim into the Kakakao cho Stockholm, “I me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me me

In order to determine whether the two are any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or dog or any dog or any dog or dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any dog or any

sent text messages containing “I ambied and frec.”

In addition to intimidation, from January 10, 2017 to March 14:59, from around 12:07 to March 15, 2017, some correction was made ex officio without changing the indictment, deeming that it is apparent that it is a clerical error in light of the description of the Kakao Stockholm message listed in the attached list of crimes, and that it is not a hindrance to Defendant A’s exercise of his right to defense.

By transmitting the Kakao Stockholm message to the victim over 46 times, the victim threatened the victim's body and life if the victim did not properly repay his/her obligation.

Accordingly, the defendant threatened the victim of the debt with respect to the debt collection.

(b) shall not receive interest exceeding 25% per annum, which is the highest interest rate under the contract for lending and borrowing of money in violation of the Interest Limitation Act;

Nevertheless, on August 4, 2016, the Defendant borrowed the horses “one million won” from D (n, 33 tax) with the exception of 150,000 won, and received payment of 1 million won per annum on the 17th day of the same month and received interest equivalent to 495.5% per annum, and received the horses “three million won lending” from D around December 27, 2016, with the exception of 50,000 won.

arrow