1. The Defendant’s KRW 16,078,200 as well as 5% per annum from August 27, 2010 to October 27, 2017 to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a corporation that has completed the registration of incorporation for the purpose of insurance business, etc. which is run under the Insurance Business Act and the relevant statutes, and is an insurer that has concluded a motor vehicle insurance contract with respect to BB another motor vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant”).

B. At around 20:30 on August 27, 2010, C driven the Defendant’s vehicle, and made the turn to the left at a speed of about 20 km at the speed of about 20 km from the KON on the part of the C, which is located in the same Ri, the intersection in front of the E-cafeteria in the Chungcheong-gun D, Chungcheongnam-do.

At this point, there are two straight lines, the Appp packing road, the road of which is almost rectangular angle, has been formed a scopic slope to a three-distance intersection, and there was a scopical road between the monthly-wing and the yellow-side bank.

C The left turn is less than the median line while going to the opposite side by making a turn turn turn to the left at the above intersection, and the Gene of the F driver's G of the F driver who was going to the right-hand side from the bend of the end of the end of the month at the end of the end of the day, and the front part of the left-hand side of the Defendant vehicle (hereinafter "the instant taxi") was shocked in front of the left-hand side of the Defendant vehicle.

C. The Plaintiff, who was accompanied by the head of the taxi of this case without being fastened of the safety level at the time due to the foregoing accident, sustained injury, such as the right upper part of the upper part, the upper part of the upper part, and the mination of the upper part of the light, for about 12 weeks of treatment.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). 【The ground for recognition” has no dispute, entry in Gap’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and 6, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Occurrence of liability;

A. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, C is reasonable to deem that the accident of this case occurred as it neglected the duty of care to make a safe turn to the right at the above intersection after well examining whether there is a vehicle that is well in compliance with the median line of the road and is going to the right at the above intersection, and that the Plaintiff suffered the above injury.

Therefore, the defendant is admitted to the defendant vehicle.