A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in the operation of the B-to-pur vehicle.

1. On October 17, 2018, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from D Driving) committed a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care

Nevertheless, the Defendant shocked the back part of the Fchip vehicle E (Ar. 29) driving due to a change of signal at the front section of the drunk, with the front part of the passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, under the influence of drinking, the Defendant: (a) caused the injury to the victim E and the passenger of the victimized vehicle by the foregoing occupational negligence in a state that the Defendant: (b) she was unable to drive the vehicle to the extent that she was able to walk-down, walk-down, walk-out, open-down, and drive the body to the extent that she was unable to properly hold the body; (c) the Defendant suffered approximately three weeks of the injury to the victim E and the victim of the victimized vehicle, she

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal to measure a drinking level) was demanded by the Defendant to respond to a drinking test by inserting a drinking measuring instrument over about 20 minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant had driven the said vehicle while driving the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol from H around the Hasan Police Station while driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a report on actual condition investigation, each investigation report (with respect to refusal of measurement), an investigation report, a breath measurement photograph, and a photograph;