The punishment of the accused shall be determined by two years of imprisonment.

Punishment of the crime

On August 16, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the Jeonju District Court's Jeonju branch court's support on August 16, 2016.

around 03:10 on June 28, 2019, the Defendant driven Dworka car at approximately 20 meters while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.297% on the front of “C” located in Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

"200 Highest 206"

1. On October 5, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) around October 20, 2019, on or around October 5, 2019, the Defendant driven a G K5 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license at a section of about 60km from the road near a bus terminal located in the Si/Eup/Eup/Myeon, to the road near the F convenience store located in the next City/Si/Eup/Myeon.

2. On October 6, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) around 01:48 October 6, 2019, the Defendant driven a GK5 vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license at a section of about 100 meters from the road near the F convenience store located in the Y in the Y in the Y in the Hasan-si in the Hasan-si (Gu) to the road front of the parking lot.

3. On October 6, 2019, at around 01:48, the Defendant was required to comply with a drinking test by inserting alcohol in a manner of inserting it into a drinking measuring instrument three-minutes for about 12 minutes, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, smelling, sniffing, sniffing, etc., from the Jan Police Station GK at the Jan District Gyeongsan Police Station, while driving a G K5 vehicle while drinking on the road near the F convenience store located in Y in Yansan-si.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 정당한 사유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) or (2) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

(i) the evidence;