The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (the imprisonment of one year and two months, confiscation, collection 1.8 million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, there are considerable social harm to the instant game result exchange crime, such as the instant crime, and in particular, the Defendant started the instant crime and committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crimes during the period of parole after having been sentenced to imprisonment for ten months for the same kind of crime.

In addition, there is no change in circumstances that are conditions for sentencing in the trial compared with the original judgment.

In full view of all such circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, circumstances surrounding the crime, and circumstances after the crime, including these circumstances, the lower court’s punishment is only within the scope of reasonable discretion and is not deemed unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.