The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (an imprisonment of six months, additional collection of ten million won) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, there are considerable social harm to money exchange crime as a result of the speculative act using game water and the use of game products, such as the instant crime, and in particular, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he was sentenced to the two-year suspended sentence in August of 2014 due to the same type of crime, even though he was sentenced to the two-year suspended sentence.

In addition, there is no change in circumstances that are conditions for sentencing in the trial compared with the original judgment.

In full view of all such circumstances as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, including these circumstances, the lower court’s punishment is only within the scope of reasonable discretion and is not recognized as unfair because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.