logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.21 2018고단3563
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in selling household goods according to the qualification of the employee of B, which is a multi-level distribution company.

1. On December 20, 2017, the Defendant borrowed KRW 15 million with the victim E at the first floor D stores of the Gwangju metropolitan building on or around December 20, 2017, the Defendant was operating a separate company, “F” in one month, with the income of KRW 1500 to KRW 20 million, and the organization does not look at KRW 20 to KRW 3 billion.

If the inside of the Republic of Korea has a lot of experience and enters the "D" store, it is expected to lend money to a third party, so that it will be repaid after one month.

“.....”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired it through the post office account in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

2. On December 29, 2017, the Defendant borrowed KRW 15 million with a view to: (a) the victim needs to pay the card price to the victim at the place described in paragraph 1 around December 29, 2017; and (b) the victim requires a payment.

It is not a case of interesting the paid-in money, and it is expected to pay back one month after lending the trusted money.

“.....”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired it through the post office account in the name of the defendant on the same day from the victim.

3. On January 2, 2018, the Defendant borrowed KRW 7 million, saying, “The Defendant, at the place indicated in Paragraph 1, said around January 2, 2018, stated that “The Defendant shall pay the Defendant the money in installments as security, and the amount borrowed so far shall be repaid three days after full payment.”

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the damaged party, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

Nevertheless, ..

arrow