logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.09.13 2018고단1821
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. by the Incheon District Court on July 22, 2016, the Defendant of "2018 High Court 18 High Court 1821, and completed the execution of the sentence in the third school of the North Korean Dos on July 1, 2017.

On July 17, 2017, the Defendant, at the “E” page of the victim D’s operation in Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, sought to talk with the victim as “I wish to talk with the victim as the head of the KTX,” and, as I wish, I would like to know about the house to live together with the victim at the time of Sejong-si. On July 19, 2017, the Defendant took the same attitude as I would like to live together with the victim.

However, in fact, the defendant was not the KTX head, and was thought to be locked after receiving money from the injured party, and did not intend to live together with the injured party.

1. On July 21, 2017, the Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant has been holding a security card of the head of the Tong with the money to be immediately transferred to the victim during the operation of the vehicle at present, and the Defendant would be paid back immediately, and that “A loan of KRW 600,000 is changed.”

However, in fact, the defendant thought that he will receive money from the injured party and did not transfer it to others, and even if he borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and acquired 600,000 won from the victims to the Saemaul Treasury account in the name of the defendant on the same day.

2. On July 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 21:00 on July 23, 2017, the victim in the vicinity of the Yongsan-dong Daejeon-dong, Daejeon, how balance is given to the passbook;

The purport was that all of the balance will be repaid immediately if it is lent.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to repay it.

As above, the defendant deceivings the victim, and thereby deceivings 180,000 won from the victim.

arrow