Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
Seized evidence subparagraphs 1 through 3 shall be confiscated.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On April 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Daegu District Court and its Daegu District Court. On April 20, 201, the judgment became final and conclusive on April 20, 201.
The defendant, together with D, is a person who operates a game room without a trade name under the ground of Daejeon Seo-gu E.
No one shall engage in speculative activities as a business by using a speculative gaming machine, and shall provide the distribution or use of the ungraded game products, or exchange or arrange exchange of the tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of the game products.
Nevertheless, in collusion with D, from June 15, 2012 to June 18, 2012, the Defendant installed 26 game 'sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-sea-to-door game machine, which is a speculative machine not classified as a class in the Daejeon-gu E-Ground, in collusion with D, the Defendant used F, G as an employee in charge of access monitoring, money exchange business, etc., and then accumulated the card by receiving cash from an unspecified number of customers visiting the place, and then delivered the card to customers, and then, the Defendant started the game by making them put the said card into the game machine and divide it into the game, and after making them obtain a specific score by obtaining a certain score in accordance with a certain form of the game association, such as the upper day of the screen, the first day, etc., by deducting 10% of the fee for money exchange acquired by customers from the game.
As a result, in collusion with the above D, the defendant exchanged the tangible and intangible results obtained through speculative acts using speculative gaming devices and the use of game products, and provided the game products that have not been rated for use.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each interrogation protocol of G and F:
1. A letter of self-sufficiency of H and I;
1. Business account books;
1. The Acts and subordinate statutes concerning seizure records;