The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the statements of the victim and witness F, the defendant can be found to have committed an indecent act because the victim's her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her part

2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, it is difficult to believe the victim and F’s statements that correspond to the facts charged in the instant case as they are, and there is no evidence to find otherwise that the Defendant committed indecent act by making the victim’s her tock, as the facts charged in the instant case, only once.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged of this case is just, and there is no error of law as alleged by the prosecutor.

At the time of the police investigation, the victim stated as if he was a witness of the defendant's indecent act, "The two male men (the defendant) who are smaller than two male people kid on the opposite side, her son her son her son her son her her son her her son with his her son her son her son her son."

그러나 원심 법정에서는 이와 달리 “피고인이 자신의 엉덩이를 만지거나 툭 치는 것을 보지는 못했다. 누군가 뒤에서 엉덩이를 툭 치고 도망가서 그 방향으로 따라가 보니 피고인이 있었고, 피고인이 혹시 아닐 수도 있는데 촉이 거의 확실히 피고인인 것 같아서 ’뭐에요‘라고 항의를 하였다”고 진술을 변경하였다.

According to the above statement made by the victim in the court below, the victim did not directly witness the accused's indecent act at the time of the instant case, and even after the group received her her her sent, it seems that the victim discovered the defendant and thought that he was the criminal, and made a protest against the defendant.

B. As to the circumstances in which the victim identified the defendant as the offender, the victim is a ‘Nu group.'